Cadbury wins Nestlé colour purple row but what next?
date:Oct 16, 2012
on more esoteric lines. It was conceded that the colour itself was distinctive but Nestl argued on the letter of the law that the mark was not a sign capable of being represented graphically.

Defining a mark graphically so that third parties can readily establish precisely what rights are owned is an essential element of trademark law. Nestl referred to a number of decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU where this issue had been discussed.

But the leading decision still clearly suggeste
4/7 next page prev page home page last page
go back |  refresh |  WAP home |  Web page version  | login
06/23 11:20