date:Sep 22, 2012
he paper that normally should have been corrected or resolved through the peer-review process.
For a paper with such potentially important findings, it would have been more satisfying to have seen something with a more conventional statistical analysis.
David Spiegelhalter, Winton Professor of the Public Understanding Of Risk, University of Cambridge, said: In my opinion, the methods, stats and reporting of results are all well below the standard I would expect in a rigorous study to be hones