date:Nov 29, 2022
for avoiding the offences. The court acknowledged that the company had reviewed its systems and steps had been taken designed to avoid further offending. The court stated that it had to balance the need to bring home to the companys management and shareholders the need to improve regulatory compliance, with the fact that the company had recently been operating at a loss.
The Court fined the company 36,000 and further ordered the company to pay a statutory surcharge of 170, and the Environment