date:Jun 12, 2012
icient explanation of the basis for the determinations; absence of proper analysis of the effects of imports under investigation; and absence of objective determination of causality.
The US also claimed the measures appear to be inconsistent with various provisions of the SCM Agreement related to the process of the subsidy investigation as well as the countervailing duty determination at issue, including improper reliance on the facts available; insufficient explanation of the basis for the det